 |
| Screen shot from tyler4mayor.com |
Let's talk about what's missing from Louisville, Ky government.
I first heard the term "inclusive engagement' in September 2009, in Jimmy Moore's living room. About a dozen people gathered one evening to launch a campaign for Tyler Allen as mayor of Louisville. We were crafting the mission and values for the campaign and we needed them FAST for the website. Tyler, who went to Northwestern and knows lots of fancy words, insisted the term be included. Although we didn't even know each other, I objected. Probably saying something like, "No, I think it's stupid and elitist." Tyler was flustered and insisted those two words stay. I yielded.
Over the next 6 months, I became pretty damn enlightened. When Tyler went out into the community, he didn't preach. He listened. And listened. And listened. Whether we were at St. James Art Fair, in Frankfort for the Fairness Lobby, or down Dixie Highway meeting with Brian Tucker, writer of
The Valley Report. One night, Tyler introduced himself as a mayor candidate to a hipster at Mag Bar, who promptly revealed he was unemployed, homeless, and not registered to vote. And yet, for the next hour in a smoke-filled room, Tyler probed the kid for what he thought about stuff. It was absolutely exhausting, and yet it was also the most-exciting thing I've ever been a part of.
 |
| inclusive engagement |
Why is Tyler passionate about
inclusive engagement? Well, when he introduced a new idea, 8664, to Louisville, he found out just how disinterested the old guard power structure was in new ideas.
The reason I've been thinking alot about this term right now, is it's precisely what's missing in Louisville, Ky government right now. And I have examples:
1) A couple months ago, my friend Stu Noland was handcuffed and detained in downtown Louisville for writing about the Ohio River Bridges Project with chalk on sidewalks.
(link) Ultimately, he took a deal and paid a fine in fact. My buddy at the ACLU assured me they were watching the situation. Well, what the hell were they watching for? They never stepped up to help him out, and his public defender finally told him to take the deal. Now there's a precedent that's kind of ridiculousness.
2) This morning I was looking over the
facebook page for John Yarmuth, and I saw this inquiry to the right, which I think is pretty damn legitimate question. One that's been up without an answer for 14 days now. So I commented on the page, in disgust:
"Why do you guys even fucking have facebook if you are going to ignore questions?" It was no surprise, the comment was deleted, just as it is no surprise David's question is still unanswered.
3) Yesterday the Greg Fischer campaign put up their
first commercial with the comments disabled, only to later take the video down and put it back up after I complained. While I'm grateful they reacted to my rant, why the hell would I have to rant about this? If they want to
inclusively engage the public, then it would make sense they would want them to comment, am I right? But do they?
4) It's no secret I have very little love for the AstroTurf Bridges Coalition. Today marks Day 23 that they took down a youtube video that had comments enabled so they could re-upload it with them disabled.
(link). As an aside both to the Fischer campaign and the Bridges Coalition, you could just change your settings, you didn't have to take the videos down. (Learn how to use the internet.) The reason the Bridges Coalition doesn't want their videos commented on? It's because they don't wish to inclusively engage the community. Period.
5) And finally, the latest failure at inclusive engagement: Ed Clere, an Indiana State Representative, has apparently deleted dozens of comments, one of which was mine, asking him to explain his position supporting tolls for the Ohio River Bridges Project. (
NA Confidential)
So now I've been blogging for a year and half, this is #287 in fact, I get 1-3 calls, emails a week from people suggesting that I take down this tweet, or this blog or this facebook status. When are you political insiders going to learn that
social media is a two-way street? Yes, you can get your message out, but can't ignore or squelch feedback or questions from citizens. The practice is wrong, and it makes you looks stupid, disengaged and out of touch when you do it.
That's where
inclusive engagement comes in. The days of controlling information and ignoring dissent, are over. For those of us that feared Noam Chomsky saw the end of the world with his discovery of manufacturing consent, we can breathe a sigh of relief and celebrate. Because it's not going to go down like that at all. If you're stuck in your 20th century paradigm of controlling information, it's time to accept that you have lost.
Sure you can wash away Stu's comments on Louisville sidewalks. You can even delete my comments on your facebook wall, or your youtube channel, but you can't delete the ideas themselves.
And you certainly can't delete them from my blog. Give it up.